CAFOD's policy team provides briefings, reports and research on our advocacy and lobbying work, plus materials to support our campaigns.
Every year, heads of donor departments, UN agencies and INGOs meet to take stock of efforts on the Grand Bargain commitments to reform the global emergency response system. This year's Annual Review happens between 30 June and 1 July. Pressure is on as an independent report on the process by the ODI argues that: "With continued entrenched policy positions by both donors and aid organisations, it has been difficult to build the trust required to make breakthroughs.”
CAFOD has worked with other NGOs to publish headline recommendations on the overarching process, which include a call for the process to be extended beyond June 2023 as ‘job not done yet’ and for a shift towards at-scale, sector-wide implementation of Grand Bargain commitments and binding policies, rather than remaining stuck at the level of pilot processes and vaguer rhetorical statements about the issues and ‘guidance’.
But when it comes to our main substantive interest - the empowerment of local civil society in crisis response - we share the following three specific recommendations.
1. Promoting local leadership
The newly-proposed Caucus on Direct Funding to Local Actors should strengthen and scale up support to country-level consortia and pooled funding instruments which promote local leadership as the most practical way to reach 25% and fund capacity-strengthening.
Why? Because both in terms of reaching the 25% target of funding to local actors, and on the commitment to increase support for institutional capacity-strengthening, then we have seen the most innovative and effective support being channelled through country-level mechanisms and consortia in which national NGOs play a lead or a co-lead role.
Of critical importance is that we need to see increased support for a more diverse ecosystem of pooled funds at the country level. The UN country-based humanitarian pooled funds support short-term emergency response, but can only be accessed by a small number of local NGOs that have reached a relatively high level of donor compliance. So more support for country-level consortia and pooled funds that invest longer-term in capacity-strengthening on preparedness, resilience and anticipatory action is much needed.
2. Strengthening accountability
All donors, UN agencies and INGOs should commit to act on proposals coming from the Intermediaries Caucus to strengthen their accountability for delivering on quality partnerships.
Negotiations in the Caucus on Intermediaries have apparently been tough at times. The issues are much more complex than other more technical agendas under the Grand Bargain, so it's not surprising it's taking time to agree proposals which all signatories might endorse on strengthening the accountability of intermediaries for their approach to partnership and localisation.
CAFOD facilitated analysis for Charter4Change of a survey of some 135 INGO country offices, and 18 INGO global headquarters on these issues, which will be published this week. This unequivocally points to the need for donors to act on the Intermediaries recommendations. Numerous INGOs reported how weak or inconsistent the current approach to accountability for partnership quality is, and how donor change on this could drive wider change in the humanitarian sector.
Luckily we heard last week that ECHO is already planning a consultation on precisely how to strengthen their approach to accountability for quality partnerships in the coming months. So the Caucus is already having an influence! That's great and we hope to see the Annual Meeting and the next steps build on this.
3. Putting the Grand Bargain theory into practice
Donors need to engage with the National Reference Groups at the country level to help translate the global Grand Bargain theory into practice.
Over the past year, CAFOD worked with local NGO partners in Colombia, South Sudan, Philippines and Syria to pilot country-level dialogues on localisation under the Grand Bargain. The next phase of the process involves establishing what’s being called ‘National Reference Groups’ to build the dialogue with a more diverse range of national NGOs on ways forward.
CAFOD believes that for these to be successful, we need to see donors engage in a proactive and supportive fashion. Ideally in each context, we need to see at least one donor step up to lead on convening donor engagement with the process and bringing ideas from it to the in-country donor coordination process.
Donors already meet and coordinate on policy in each context, but this is often intransparent and does not frequently engage with national NGOs. We would like to see the National Reference Groups become an entry-point for shifting this. Donors hold the purse strings and influence over other Grand Bargain signatories. Let’s see this happen now at the country level!
As one CAFOD national partner – Gloria Modong Morris of Titi Foundation – recently put it in a session to brief members of the British parliament on the situation in South Sudan: “Local actors remain perceived as “implementers” of international agencies and are far from being treated equally to international actors. […] To a large extent, donors are perpetuating these power imbalances."
The task for this year’s Grand Bargain Annual Review and the follow up is to change this so that one year from now Gloria and other local civil society leaders around the world can report back on meaningful change. That is our test!